This year, the conference will present six awards to outstanding institutions, organizations, and individuals in the field of Business Continuity and Resiliency to stimulate institutional and individual excellence with a transparent criterion and a clear mechanism for selecting the best applicants for the award. The Awards are:
S | Award Title |
---|---|
1 | Provider of Continuity and Resilience 2025 Award (Service/Product) |
2 | Emerging Leader in Continuity and Resilience 2025 Award |
3 | Excellence in Public Sector Continuity and Resilience 2025 Award |
4 | Excellence in Private Sector Continuity and Resilience 2025 Award |
5 | Most Effective National Recovery 2025 Award |
6 | National Resilience Excellence Award 2025 |
The information below will help you understand the application criteria, judging process, and rules. Please review the rules carefully to ensure that you are eligible to apply and that your submission is complete and meets all requirements.
It is important to emphasize that the awards process has specific rules in place, and it is imperative to follow them. Failure to do so may result in disqualification. The following are the general criteria that applications must meet:
To evaluate applicants’ evidence-based submissions, the judges will use the following three performance descriptors:
Level | Score Range | Narrative |
---|---|---|
High-quality evidence | Score between 4-5 | Applicant’s evidence is timebound, addresses the criterion and is thoroughly explained. |
Moderate quality evidence | Score between 2-3 | Applicant’s evidence is timebound, partly addresses the criterion and is somewhat explained. |
Low-quality evidence | Score between 0-1 | Applicant’s evidence is not dated, does not address the criterion, or is poorly explained. |
To ensure a transparent and equitable application process and select the most deserving award recipients, a committee consisting of the Head Judge and experts in several industries will review, evaluate, and score the applications and evidence based on the above score criteria.
The Head Judge will call for Moderation meetings if a consensus cannot be reached. These meetings are essential for promoting consistency, impartiality, and inclusivity in judging. In case no consensus has yet been reached, the Head Judge will make the final decision.
For more information on how to apply, please contact awards@bcrc.qa.
©2025 All Rights Reserved to BCRC