The information provided below will assist you in understanding the criteria for the application, the judging process, and the rules.
We encourage applicants to carefully review the rules to ensure they are eligible to apply and that their submission is complete and meets the necessary requirements.
Application Rules:
It’s important to emphasize that the awards process has specific rules in place, and it’s imperative to follow them. Failure to do so, may result in the disqualification the application. The below provide a generic criterion that application shall meet:
Scoring Criteria:
To evaluate applicants’ evidence-based submissions, the judges will use three performance descriptors as outlined below:
Level | Score range | Narrative |
High-quality evidence: | Score between 4-5 | Applicant’s evidence is timebound, addresses the criterion and is thoroughly explained. |
Moderate quality evidence: | Score between 2-3 | Applicant’s evidence is timebound, partly addresses the criterion and is somewhat explained. |
Low-quality evidence: | Score between 0-1 | Applicant’s evidence is not dated, does not address the criterion, or is poorly explained. |
Moderation and Decision:
To ensure a transparent and equitable application process and select the most deserving award recipients, a committee consisting of the Head Judge and experts in several industries will concern and discuss, review, and examine the application, evidence, and score and deliberate the application based on the above score criteria.
The Head Judge will call for Moderation meetings if a consensus cannot be reached. These meetings are essential for promoting consistency, impartiality, and inclusivity in judging. In case no consensus has yet been reached, the head judge will make the final decision.
For more information on how to apply, please contact awards@bcrc.qa.
©2023 All Rights Reserved to BCRC